The Society of Rheology 88th Annual Meeting

February 12-16, 2017 - Tampa, Florida


SM33 


Polymer Solutions & Melts


Melt extensional rheology: SER vs. FSR and internal energy buildup


February 15, 2017 (Wednesday) 1:30


Track 5 / Snowy Egret

(Click on name to view author profile)

  1. Lin, Panpan (University of Akorn)
  2. Zhao, Z.C. (University of Akorn)
  3. Liu, Jianning (University of Akron)
  4. Wang, Zhen-Gang (Caltech)
  5. Wang, Shi-Qing (University of Akorn)

(in printed abstract book)
Panpan Lin1, Z.C. Zhao1, Jianning Liu1, Zhen-Gang Wang2, and Shi-Qing Wang1
1University of Akorn, Akron, OH; 2Caltech, Pasadena, CA


Wang, Shi-Qing


In this presentation, we discuss extensional rheological behavior of various polymer melts using either SER (Sentmanat Extensional Rheometer) or Instron. After discussing the physics behind the emergence of tensile strain localization, we provide evidence for lack of fully developed flow state in such a global extensional test. While SER ensures homogeneous extension until the onset of extensional failure, FSR (filament stretching rheometer) does the opposite by applying non-uniform extension. Thus, SER is to simple shear achieved in small gap approximation of parallel-plate displacement as FSR is to capillary extrusion that merely supplies a constant throughput. By monitoring the temperature of the specimens in melt extension, we detected a sizable level of internal energy that can be as high as a significant fraction of the total mechanical work. Moreover, the internal energy build-up continues monotonically until the onset of specimen breakup. We conclude that well-entangled melts cannot transform from the initial state of rubbery-like elastic deformation to a flow state in uniaxial extension, contrary to the claims based on the FSR measurements that a steady extensional flow state is accessible in uniaxial melt extension. Finally, we disclose additional evidence concerning the origin of the internal energy storage.